Legal Opinion

Schumacher v. Streich

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided October 22, 1926No. 25,533PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Dibe>L>l, J.

Action to set aside a mortgage and deed as fraudulent as to the plaintiff, a judgment creditor. There were findings for the plaintiff and the defendants appeal from the order denying their motion for a new trial.

On October 25, 1924, a judgment was entered in favor of the plaintiff against the defendants Albert A. and Henry Streich for $1,090.81. On March 31, 1925, a judgment was entered in favor of the plaintiff and against the two defendants named and Wilhelmine Streich for $4,315.62. On August 8, 1924, the defendant Albert A. Streich mortgaged a farm to the defendants Emma M.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Pfefferkorn v. SeefieldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
  2. State Bank of Gibbon v. WalterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Barnard v. SeamanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
  2. Weese v. WeeseSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1934
  3. Fernando v. Continental Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API