Legal Opinion

Ziolkowski v. Continental Casualty Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided April 11, 1933No. Gen. No. 36,226PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Presiding Justice Soanlan

delivered the opinion of the court.

Plaintiff sued defendant in assumpsit as beneficiary under an accident insurance policy issued by defendant to one Joseph Sarnoüski. The case was tried by the court, without a jury, and the issues were found for plaintiff and damages were assessed in the sum of $2,645. Defendant has appealed from a judgment entered upon the finding.

The declaration consisted of one count and contained a copy of the contract of insurance. Defendant filed a plea of the general issue and two special pleas, the first special plea alleging “that the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. See v. North American Accident InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  2. General Accident, Fire & Life Assurance Corp. v. HymesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  3. Newsome v. Travelers InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1915
  4. Travelers Protective Ass'n v. FawcettIndiana Court of Appeals · 1914
  5. Continental Casualty Co. v. CunninghamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1914

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ziolkowski v. Continental Casualty Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1937
  2. E. J. Albrecht Co. v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New YorkAppellate Court of Illinois · 1937
  3. Porter v. Continental Casualty Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1934
  4. Ziolkowski v. Continental Casualty Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API