Bull v. Chicago, M. & St. Ry. Co.
District Court, W.D. Washington
1Opinion of the CourtNeterer, District Judge
(after stating the faets as above). Court proceedings can only be instituted by the parties and in the manner provided by law.
Section 221, Rem. C. S. of Wash., provides : “The summons must be subscribed by the plaintiff or his attorney, and directed to the defendant requiring him to answer * * * within twenty days after the serv- • • *» ice.
*330Section 222, Code, supra, provides that the summons “ * * * shall be subscribed by the plaintiff * * * with the addition of his postoffice address, at which the papers in the action may be served on him by mail.”
Section 281, supra: “Every pleading shall be…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Lambert Run Coal Co. v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- General Investment Co. v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Mechanical Appliance Co. v. CastlemanSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Remington v. Central Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Ezell v. DodsonTexas Supreme Court · 1883
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Wilhelm v. Consolidated Oil CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1936
- Sweeney v. Greenwood Index-Journal Co.District Court, W.D. South Carolina · 1941
- United States v. PalmerDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1927
- Wilhelm v. Consolidated Oil Corp.District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 1935
- The Coalition to Protect Puget Sound Habitat v. US Army Corps of EngineersDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2022