Legal Opinion

The Coalition to Protect Puget Sound Habitat v. US Army Corps of Engineers

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided September 6, 2022No. 2:16-cv-00950Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 7 AT SEATTLE 8 THE COALITION TO PROTECT PUGET Case No. C16-0950RSL 9 SOUND HABITAT, 10 ORDER GRANTING Plaintiff, ATTORNEY FEES AND 11 v. EXPENSES 12 U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, et al., 13 Defendant. 14 and 15 TAYLOR SHELLFISH COMPANY, INC., 16 Intervenor - Defendant. 17 18 This matter comes before the Court on plaintiff’s motion for attorney fees and expenses 19 20 under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d)(1)(A) (Dkt. # 99). Having 21 reviewed plaintiff’s motion as well as plaintiff’s…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Commissioner, Immigration & Naturalization Service v. JeanSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. Missouri v. Jenkins Ex Rel. AgyeiSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API