Legal Opinion

United States v. Palmer

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided April 7, 1927No. 2889PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BREWSTER, District Judge.

The above-entitled action is brought by the United States of America against 21 individual defendants and one corporate defendant, several of whom resided outside of this district. Of these latter are the defendants Chase Securities Corporation, William G. Fitzpatrick, Joseph F- Guffey, and John A. MaeMartin, who have appeared specially and now ask this court to quash the writ and process and the service thereon.

On September 16, 1926, a writ of summons and attachment in the usual form issued out of this court. The writ commanded the marshal of the district of…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Eastman Kodak Co. v. Southern Photo Materials Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
  2. Robertson v. Railroad Labor BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  3. Lee v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
  4. Seaboard Rice Milling Co. v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  5. Munter v. Weil Corset Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Keller v. American Sales Book Co.District Court, W.D. New York · 1936
  2. United States ex rel. American Tar Products Co. v. SeverinDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1934
  3. United States v. RockhillDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1950
  4. North v. Samsung SDI America, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2020
  5. North v. Samsung SDI America, Inc.District Court, E.D. Texas · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API