Legal Opinion
Wilhelm v. Consolidated Oil Corp.
District Court, N.D. Oklahoma
Decided June 28, 1935No. 970PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FRANKLIN E. KENNAMER, District Judge.
The bill discloses that, at and prior to the transactions of which they complain, the plaintiffs were stockholders of either or both the Prairie Oil & Gas Company and the Prairie Pipeline Company (now by change of name, respectively,-the Commonwealth Oil & Gas Company, and the Commonwealth Transportation Company) both Kansas corporations, and they sue as stockholders or former stockholders of such corporations for themselves and for others similarly situated who may care to join. Their complaint has for its genesis the execution of a triparty contract,…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Cannon Manufacturing Co. v. Cudahy Packing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1925
- People's Tobacco Co. v. American Tobacco Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Hart Steel Co. v. Railroad Supply Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. Minneapolis Civic & Commerce Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Peterson v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Mainord v. SharpCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1977
- American Surety Co. v. Edwards & Bradford Lumber Co.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 1944
- Robinson v. Seatex Oil Co.District Court, N.D. Texas · 1944