Legal Opinion

New Medium LLC v. Barco N.V.

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided March 18, 2009No. 05 C 5620Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

RICHARD A. POSNER, Circuit Judge Sitting by designation.

Before the Court are six motions by Barco for partial summary judgment. I refer to the various plaintiff companies and individuals, and their agents and their predeeessors-in-interest, collectively as “Plaintiffs.”

Barco’s motion for partial summary judgment of non-infringement of U.S. Patent No. 4,573,070 based on a license to Matsushita [728] is granted.

Plaintiffs have alleged that Barco’s BarcoGraphics 4000 projector, which Barco sold from 2000-2002, infringes their U.S. Patent No. 4,573,070. That projector was…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. A.C. Aukerman Company v. R.L. Chaides Construction Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
  2. Joy Technologies, Inc., and A/s Niro Atomizer, Involuntary v. Flakt, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
  3. Freedman Seating Co. v. American Seating Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
  4. Symantec Corp. v. Computer Associates International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
  5. Ecolab, Inc. v. Envirochem, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API