Legal Opinion
Static Control Components, Inc. v. Lexmark International, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Kentucky
Decided May 4, 2007No. 5:02-571, 5:04-84Published
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
VAN TATENHOVE, District Judge.
SCC’s Motions for Partial Summary Judgement of No Direct Infringement by Anonymous Remanufacturers [R. 515] and No Direct Infringement by Any Non-Party [R. 528] are before the Court for consideration. The Motions will be denied.
I
BACKGROUND
The facts of this case are more fully set forth in this Court’s Order dated April 24, 2007 at Record No. 1008 and need not be reproduced in whole here. For purposes of the current Motion, Lexmark is a large producer of printers and toner cartridges for its printers. SCC is “a leading supplier to toner cartridge…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Avia Group International, Inc., (Formerly Pensa, Inc.) v. L.A. Gear California, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Metabolite Laboratories, Inc. And Competitive Technologies, Inc. v. Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings (Doing Business as Labcorp)Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.