Legal Opinion

Los Angeles County Employees Ass'n v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 1, 2000No. B128720PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MASTERSON, J.

In 1996, the Compton Municipal Court implemented a plan to reduce the number of deputy court clerks covered by the civil service system. Under the plan, all newly hired or promoted clerks were designated as non-civil service. The clerks’ union brought this action, challenging the municipal court plan. The trial court issued a writ of mandate directing the municipal court to accord civil service status to all of its deputy court clerks. The municipal court has appealed. We affirm.

Background

Since 1949, deputy municipal court clerks in Los Angeles County have enjoyed the…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Brydonjack v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Superior Court v. County of MendocinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Johnson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Millholen v. RileyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  5. In Re McKinneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Jones v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
  2. Holmgren v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  3. L.A. County Employees Retirement Association v. County of L.A.California Supreme Court · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API