Legal Opinion

Haslett v. New Albany Belt & Terminal Railroad

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided September 27, 1893No. 853PublishedCited by 12 opinions

From the Floyd Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtRoss, J.

The appellant filed his application in the court below for a writ of assessment of damages, under sections 905-909, R. S. 1881.

The appellee was duly notified, a jury empaneled, and *604damages assessed in the sum of five hundred and ten dollars. The appellee filed exceptions to the award. After issues joined, the cause was submitted to a jury for trial, and a verdict returned in favor of the appellee. The appellant thereupon filed his motion and causes for a new trial, which was overruled by the court, and judgment rendered on the verdict in favor of the appellee. The appellant has assigned but…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. City of Indianapolis v. KingsburyIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  2. State v. BerdettaIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  3. Cox v. Louisville, New Albany, & Chicago RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
  4. Ross v. ThompsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  5. Cummins v. City of SeymourIndiana Supreme Court · 1881

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. NoftsgerIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Grand Trunk Western Railway Co. v. City of South BendIndiana Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Irvin v. CrammondIndiana Court of Appeals · 1915
  4. Huffman v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1899
  5. Jose v. HunterIndiana Court of Appeals · 1913

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API