Legal Opinion

Huffman v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided January 25, 1899No. 2,657PublishedCited by 7 opinions

From the Blackford Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtWiley, J.

Appellant was prosecuted for trespass under the following provision of the statute: “Whoever * * * being unlawfully upon the inclosed or uninclosed laiid of another, shall be notified to depart therefrom by the owner or occupant, or his agent or servant; and * * * neglect or refuse to depart therefrom, — shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, and, upon *451conviction thereof, shall be fined not less than five nor more than fifty dollars.” Section 2018, Burns’ R. S. 1894 (1941, Horner’s R. S. 1897). While, in the court below, a motion to quash the affidavit (the prosecution having originated before a…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Indiana, Bloomington & Western Railway Co. v. AllenIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Brookville & Metamora Hydraulic Co. v. ButlerIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
  3. Adams v. RiversNew York Supreme Court · 1851
  4. Kincaid v. Indianapolis Natural Gas Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Sherlock v. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1888

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. City of Evansville v. FollisIndiana Court of Appeals · 1974
  2. De Tarr v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1906
  3. Town of Newpoint v. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1915
  4. Fox v. Ohio Valley Gas Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1968
  5. Town of Odgen Dunes v. WildermuthIndiana Court of Appeals · 1968

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API