Legal Opinion
Ferreira v. Mereda Realty Corp.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided April 9, 2009PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Howard H. Sherman, J.), entered June 9, 2008, which denied appellants’ motion for summary judgment declaring that respondent had an obligation to defend and indemnify them in the personal injury action and granted respondent’s cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the third-party complaint and directed entry of judgment, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Appellant insureds were required by the policy to notify the insurer “as soon as practicable of an ‘occurrence’ or offense which may result in a claim.” Here, where they did not give notice for…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Great Canal Realty Corp. v. Seneca InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 2005
- Paramount Insurance v. Rosedale Gardens, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Yale Club of New York City, Inc. v. Reliance InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Ancillary Receivership of Reliance Insurance v. Reliance InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 2009
- Kambousi Restaurant, Inc. v. Burlington InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Savik v. ITT Hartford Insurance GroupAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Hermitage Insurance v. Athena Management Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- Hermitage Insurance v. Athena Management Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- Tower Insurance v. Babylon Fish & Clam, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011