Legal Opinion
Ancillary Receivership of Reliance Insurance v. Reliance Insurance
New York Court of Appeals
Decided February 11, 2009PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order affirmed, with costs. Based on the arguments presented, the Appellate Division did not err in concluding that the insurance company could not rely on the August 1993 letter as the basis to avoid coverage under the claims-made policy.
Concur: Acting Chief Judge Ciparick and Judges Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Jones.
2Cited by4 opinions
- Ferreira v. Mereda Realty Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- SPOLETA CONSTRUCTION, LLC v. ASPEN INSURANCE UK LIMITEDAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- SPOLETA CONSTRUCTION, LLC v. ASPEN INSURANCE UK LIMITEDAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- SPOLETA CONSTRUCTION, LLC v. ASPEN INSURANCE UK LIMITEDAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014