Legal Opinion

Savik v. ITT Hartford Insurance Group

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 28, 2011PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*491This is an action for a judgment granting reimbursement of defense costs and declaring that defendants, plaintiffs insurers, were obligated to defend and indemnify plaintiff in an arbitration proceeding brought by Farmingdale Development Corporation (FDC). On this record, we find, as a matter or law, that Hartford and QBE did not receive timely notice of the underlying occurrence as required by their respective policies. Plaintiff is a limited liability company managed by Frank Vero, Sr. and two other managing members. In 1998, plaintiff began its work as the construction manager in the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Security Mutual Insurance v. Acker-Fitzsimons Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1972
  2. Fitzpatrick v. American Honda Motor Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1991
  3. Kirschner v. KPMG LLPNew York Court of Appeals · 2010
  4. Great Canal Realty Corp. v. Seneca InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 2005
  5. Fieldston Property Owners Ass'n v. Hermitage InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 2011

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Board of Managers of the 125 North 10th Condominium v. 125North10, LLCNew York Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Matter of Vornado 330 W. 34th St., L.L.C. v. 330 W. 34th SPE LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2023
  3. Matter of Vornado 330 W. 34th St., L.L.C. v. 330 W. 34th SPE LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2023
  4. Suez Treatment Solutions, Inc. v. ACE American Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API