Legal Opinion

Beeks v. State Bar of California

California Supreme Court

Decided April 28, 1950No. S. F. 17886Published

1Opinion of the Court

35 Cal.2d 268 (1950)

LEWIS K. BEEKS, Petitioner,

v.

THE STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIA, Respondent.

S. F. No. 17886.

Supreme Court of California. In Bank.

Apr. 28, 1950.

Lewis K. Beeks, in pro. per., John Adams, Jr., and R. J. Reynolds for Petitioner.

Jerold E. Weil for Respondent.

THE COURT.

Petitioner seeks reinstatement as a member of The State Bar of California. His application has been refused favorable recommendation by the Board of Governors of The State Bar. (Rules on Appeal, rule 59(b).) We have concluded that for the reasons which hereinafter appear reinstatement should be denied.

Petitioner is now…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Kepler v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  2. In Re AndreaniCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Wettlin v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  4. McArthur v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Beeks v. State Bar of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API