Legal Opinion
Hardesty v. Corrothers
District Court, N.D. West Virginia
Decided January 20, 1940PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HARRY E. WATKINS, District Judge.
This is an action brought by the plaintiff as receiver of the insolvent National Bank of Fairmont under 12 U.S.C.A. §§ 63, 64, to recover an assessment duly levied upon the shares of stock of that institution, of which the defendants are claimed to have been the owners on the day upon which the bank closed. All the defendants say that the action is barred by the statute of limitations. The defendants Mary E. Wilson, John W. Corrothers and Audra E. Cross deny ownership of the stock. A jury was waived and the action was submitted to the court upon an agreed…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Bernheimer v. ConverseSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
- McClaine v. RankinSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Brown v. O'KEEFESupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Keyser v. HitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Williams v. VreelandSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Bank of America, N.A. v. Veluchamy (In re Veluchamy)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 2014
- Tennant v. SatterfieldWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1975
- Stayton v. Delaware Trust Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1965
- Stayton v. Delaware Trust CompanyCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1965