Legal Opinion
Espinoza v. Department of Justice
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided February 27, 2014No. Civil Action No. 2012-1950PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY, United States District Judge
In this action brought pro se, plaintiff claims that the Executive Office for United States Attorneys (“EOUSA”) violated the Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”), 5 U.S.C. § 552, by withholding responsive records and denying his requests for expedited processing and a fee waiver. Defendants move to dismiss under Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure on the ground that plaintiff has failed to exhaust his administrative remedies or for summary judgment under Rule 56. Defs.’ Mot. to Dismiss or, in the…
2Cases cited50 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Lujan v. National Wildlife FederationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- United States Department of Justice v. Reporters Committee for Freedom of the PressSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Robert G. Vaughn v. Bernard Rosen, Executive Director, United States Civil Service CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
- Carl Oglesby v. The United States Department of the ArmyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1990
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Riddick v. United States Department of JusticeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Middle E. Forum v. U.S. Dep't of the TreasuryCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Francis v. United States Department of Justice Office of Information PolicyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Judicial Watch, Inc. v. National Archives and Records AdministrationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- BIGGINS v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICEDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2025
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.