Legal Opinion
Riddick v. United States Department of Justice
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided September 29, 2015No. Civil Action No. 2013-1512PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
CHRISTOPHER R. COOPER, United States District Judge
Plaintiff Harry Lee Riddick, proceeding pro se, brings this action seeking records from the Executive Office for U.S. Attorneys (“EOUSA”), a component of the U.S. Department of Justice (“DOJ”). Because Riddick demands the release of records allegedly maintained by an executive branch agency of the federal government, the Court construes his Complaint as one under the Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”). See 5 U.S.C. § 552. This matter comes before the Court on the parties’ cross motions for summary judgment and on…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Military Audit Project, Felice D. Cohen, Morton H. Halperin v. William Casey, Director of Central IntelligenceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1981
- Stokes v. United States Parole CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2004
- Schoenman v. Federal Bureau of InvestigationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- Shapiro v. United States Department of JusticeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Ahuruonye v. U.S. Dep't of InteriorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Bey v. Wash. Metro. Area Transit Auth.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Ahuruonye v. Department of the InteriorDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2018
- American Civil Liberties Union v. Federal Bureau of PrisonsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2022
- Crawford v. SessionsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2019
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.