Mosle v. Bidwell
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York. This cause comes here upon writ of error to review a judgment of the Circuit Court in favor of defendant in error, who was defendant below, sustaining a demurrer to the complaint. The action was to recover from the collector of the'port of New York certain duties collected upon sugars imported from the island of Porto Rico.
1Per curiam
The sugars were imported and stored in bonded warehouse on April 4, 1899. The tariff act of July 24, 1897, c. 11, schedule E, 30 Stat. 168 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 1647], imposed duties on sugars, and there has been no change in that schedule down to the time when the collector exacted duties on this importation. On April 11, 1899, by exchange of ratifications, the treaty of peace between the United States and Spain (30 Stat. 1754), ceding the island of Porto Rico to the United States; became effective. The Supreme Court has held in De Lima v. Bidwell, 182 U. S. 1, 21 Sup. Ct. 743, 45 L. Ed.…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- De Lima v. BidwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
- United States v. FreemanSupreme Court of the United States · 1845
3Cited by17 opinions
- United States v. G. Falk & BrotherSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
- M. H. Pulaski Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1915
- United States v. Cronkhite Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1919
- United States v. Estate of BoshellCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1922
- Dougherty v. First Nat. Bank of CantonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1912
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.