Legal Opinion

United States v. Estate of Boshell

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided November 19, 1922No. 2770PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBakbeR, Judge

Section 308 of the Tariff Act of 1922 contains the following provisions :

That the following articles, when not imported for sale or for sale on approval, may be admitted into the United States under such rules and regulations as the Secretary of the Treasury may prescribe, without the payment of duty under bond for their exportation within six months from the date of importation: * * *(5) Articles intended solely for experimental purposes, and upon satisfactory proof to the Secretary that any such article has been destroyed because of its use for experimental purposes such bond may be…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Cunard Steamship Co. v. MellonSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  2. MEREDITH v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1839
  3. Marriott v. BruneSupreme Court of the United States · 1850
  4. Lawder v. StoneSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
  5. The Ship Richmond v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1815

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. United States v. FieldCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1927
  2. Camera Specialty Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1955
  3. Philip Morris USA, Inc. v. LeeDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 2006
  4. Charles T. Smith, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1943
  5. Procter & Gamble Manufacturing Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1932

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API