United States v. Cronkhite Co.
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Appeal from Board of United States General Appraisers, G. A. 8149 (T. D. 37579). [Oral argument Oct. 30, 1918, by Mr. Hanson and Mr. Hampton.]
1Opinion of the CourtDe Vries, Judge
The considerations bad in F. B. Vandegrift Co. v. United States (9 Ct. Cust. Appls., 112; T. D. 37978) are equally pertinent in this appeal. The differentiating facts in the two cases require, however, separate consideration. In this case the merchandise was shipped from Japan and came into the country at Tacoma, Wash., on July 17, 1916. Immediate transportation entry was made'and the goods shipped in bond without appraisement to Jersey City,.which is within the limits of the port of New York. They arrived at Jersey City on the morning of September 8, 1916, and were entered on that day as…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- United States v. American Sugar Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1906
- United States v. BurrSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Hartranft v. OliverSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Fabbri v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- City of Mankato v. Barber Asphalt Paving Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1905
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- United States v. Estate of BoshellCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1922
- Kee Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
- Protests 961296-G of Tassini & Salisch-Parver, Inc.United States Customs Court · 1941
- Vandegrift & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1919
- Wilcon v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1944
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.