Legal Opinion

Solomon v. Highland Park Civil Service Commission

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided September 22, 1975No. Docket 19487PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Hara, J.

This case is before us a second time by reason of our order of remand reported at 47 Mich App 536, 541; 209 NW2d 698 (1973):

"Plaintiff is entitled to back pay from September 30, *4351969, the date all pending indictments against him were dismissed.
"Reversed, no costs.
"All concurred.”

On remand the issue raised was how much "back pay” plaintiff was entitled to. The circuit judge entered a judgment in the amount of $49,-922 plus some $9,601.71 in interest. Subsequently, an amended judgment was entered. The latter judgment did not affect either of the above two provisions.

From this judgment…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Shiffer v. Board of Education of Gibraltar School DistrictMichigan Supreme Court · 1974
  2. People ex rel. Throop v. LangdonMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
  3. Parker v. Township of West BloomfieldMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975
  4. Civil Service Commission v. PitlockMichigan Court of Appeals · 1973
  5. Solomon v. Highland Park Civil Service CommissionMichigan Court of Appeals · 1973

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. People v. CoutuMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Schultz v. Oakland CountyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1991
  3. Aguirre v. State of MichiganMichigan Court of Appeals · 2016
  4. Krajewski v. City of Royal OakMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983
  5. Graves v. City of LansingMichigan Court of Appeals · 1986

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API