Legal Opinion

McClendon v. Nabisco Brands, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 29, 1986No. 83-10845; CA A33908PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWarden, J.

Claimant petitions for judicial review of a Workers’ Compensation Board order reversing the referee’s opinion which ordered employer to accept her claim. On de novo review, we reverse and reinstate the referee’s order.

Claimant was an assembly line worker with Nabisco for 13 years, working primarily on the high volume chocolate chip, Oreo and cracker lines. • Her work involved quick, repetitive motions, twisting, reaching and lifting loads of approximately two pounds. The arm movements ranged from waist to eye level. She first experienced shoulder irritation in the summer of 1982. She went to…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Weller v. Union Carbide Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Coday v. WILLAMETTE TUG & BARGE COMPANYOregon Supreme Court · 1968
  3. James v. State Accident Insurance FundOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  4. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp. v. GygiCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
  5. Wheeler v. Boise Cascade Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1985

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Freightliner Corp. v. ArnoldCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  2. Baar v. Fairview Training CenterCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  3. Bank of Newport v. WagesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  4. SAIF Corp. v. DurantCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  5. SAIF Corp. v. DeMarcoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API