Legal Opinion

McGraw v. Township of Lake

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 6, 1934No. Docket No. 138, Calendar No. 37,667PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBushnell, J.

Defendant appeals from a judgment entered in the sum of $10,000 by the circuit court after a trial without a jury. Plaintiff, an attorney-at-law, declared on an agreement for legal services performed by him for defendant in the appeal of Township of Lake v. Millar, 257 Mich. 135, a county drain case. It is his claim that it was agreed that a retainer of $300 was to be payment in full unless he succeeded in obtaining a reversal or modification of the circuit' court decree, in which event he was to receive “reasonable compensation.” A bill for professional services in the sum of $17,500 was…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Township of Lake v. MillarMichigan Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Turnbull v. RichardsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Kinsler v. SimpsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Kelley v. RichardsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
  5. Szydelko v. Smith's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1932

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Fletcher v. School Dist. Bd. of Ed.Michigan Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Penn-Florida Hotels Corp. v. Atlantic National BankSupreme Court of Florida · 1936
  3. Bubser v. RanguetteMichigan Supreme Court · 1934
  4. In Re Finn's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Baker v. Hall-Dodds Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API