Legal Opinion

Freeney v. Pape

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided November 10, 1937No. 11809PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Jenkins, Justice.

Paragraph 1 of the ruling in the syllabus, dealing with the attack on the statute creating county probation officers as being violative of art. 11, see. 3, par. 1, of the constitution (Code, § 2-8401), may properly be elaborated. This paragraph of the constitution is as follows: "Whatever tribunal, or officers, may hereafter be created by the General Assembly for the *5transaction of county matters, shall be uniform throughout the State, and of the same name, jurisdiction, and remedies,” save as to certain named exceptions not relevant to a determination of this case. Does the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Abbott v. CommissionersSupreme Court of Georgia · 1925
  2. Bone v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1890
  3. Mathis v. JonesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1890
  4. Starnes v. Mutual Loan & Banking Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1897
  5. Butler v. PapeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1936

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. City of Atlanta v. HudginsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1942
  2. Housing Authority v. AyersSupreme Court of Georgia · 1955
  3. Allied Enterprises, Inc. v. BrooksCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1956
  4. Baggett Transportation Co. v. BarnesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1963
  5. MacNeill v. SteeleSupreme Court of Georgia · 1938

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API