Freeney v. Pape
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Jenkins, Justice.
Paragraph 1 of the ruling in the syllabus, dealing with the attack on the statute creating county probation officers as being violative of art. 11, see. 3, par. 1, of the constitution (Code, § 2-8401), may properly be elaborated. This paragraph of the constitution is as follows: "Whatever tribunal, or officers, may hereafter be created by the General Assembly for the *5transaction of county matters, shall be uniform throughout the State, and of the same name, jurisdiction, and remedies,” save as to certain named exceptions not relevant to a determination of this case. Does the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Abbott v. CommissionersSupreme Court of Georgia · 1925
- Bone v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1890
- Mathis v. JonesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1890
- Starnes v. Mutual Loan & Banking Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1897
- Butler v. PapeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1936
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- City of Atlanta v. HudginsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1942
- Housing Authority v. AyersSupreme Court of Georgia · 1955
- Allied Enterprises, Inc. v. BrooksCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1956
- Baggett Transportation Co. v. BarnesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1963
- MacNeill v. SteeleSupreme Court of Georgia · 1938
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.