Housing Authority v. Ayers
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Hawkins, Justice.
(After stating the foregoing facts.) Headnotes 1, 2, 3, and 4 require no elaboration.
The defendant, by its answer and cross-action, admitted the execution of the contract, and that the housing project had fceén completed, but denied liability to the plaintiff, and alleged that, because' of the negligent performance of its services by the plaintiff, the defendant had incurred additional construction costs in a sum greatly in excess of the amount claimed by the plaintiff, and sought by way of recoupment to recover damages against the plaintiff. The defendant’s cross-action…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Porter v. Davey Tree-Expert Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1925
- Rinzler v. FolsomSupreme Court of Georgia · 1953
- Freeney v. PapeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1937
- Cox v. MartinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1950
- Block v. HappSupreme Court of Georgia · 1915
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- The Flintkote Company v. Dravo Corporation, Diamond Manufacturing Company, Inc. And B. F. Diamond Construction Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1982
- Ponce De Leon Condominiums v. DiGirolamoSupreme Court of Georgia · 1977
- Mauldin v. ShefferCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
- Housing Auth. of Savannah v. GreeneSupreme Court of Georgia · 1989
- Berryhill v. Georgia Community Support & Solutions, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 2006
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.