Legal Opinion

Housing Authority v. Ayers

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided July 13, 1955No. 18940PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hawkins, Justice.

(After stating the foregoing facts.) Headnotes 1, 2, 3, and 4 require no elaboration.

The defendant, by its answer and cross-action, admitted the execution of the contract, and that the housing project had fceén completed, but denied liability to the plaintiff, and alleged that, because' of the negligent performance of its services by the plaintiff, the defendant had incurred additional construction costs in a sum greatly in excess of the amount claimed by the plaintiff, and sought by way of recoupment to recover damages against the plaintiff. The defendant’s cross-action…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Porter v. Davey Tree-Expert Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1925
  2. Rinzler v. FolsomSupreme Court of Georgia · 1953
  3. Freeney v. PapeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1937
  4. Cox v. MartinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1950
  5. Block v. HappSupreme Court of Georgia · 1915

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. The Flintkote Company v. Dravo Corporation, Diamond Manufacturing Company, Inc. And B. F. Diamond Construction Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1982
  2. Ponce De Leon Condominiums v. DiGirolamoSupreme Court of Georgia · 1977
  3. Mauldin v. ShefferCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
  4. Housing Auth. of Savannah v. GreeneSupreme Court of Georgia · 1989
  5. Berryhill v. Georgia Community Support & Solutions, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 2006

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API