Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Nothstein
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
It is well-established by this court that embezzlement of funds is demonstrative of sufficient moral turpitude to justify disbarment. Bar Assn. v. McGarry (1979), 60 Ohio St.2d 168 [14 O.O.3d 406]; Lake County Bar Assn. v. Ostrander (1975), 41 Ohio St.2d 93 [70 O.O.2d 173]. Such a determination, however, is neither lightly nor automatically imposed. See, e.g., Reinstatement of Rasor (1974), 40 Ohio St. 2d 25 [69 O.O.2d 127] (mitigating circumstances offered with a finding that petitioner had rehabilitated himself to justify readmission to the bar).
In the present cause respondent’s apparent…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Lake County Bar Ass'n v. OstranderOhio Supreme Court · 1975
- Bar Ass'n of Greater Cleveland v. McGarryOhio Supreme Court · 1979
- In re Reinstatement of RasorOhio Supreme Court · 1974
3Cited by4 opinions
- Committee on Legal Ethics v. SixWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1989
- Cincinnati Bar Association v. WiestOhio Supreme Court · 2016
- Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. GeronOhio Supreme Court · 1987
- People v. LacalloColorado Court of Appeals · 2014