Legal Opinion

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Geron

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided August 19, 1987No. D.D. No. 86-33Published

1Per curiam

Having reviewed the record, the findings of fact, and conclusions of the board, this court determines that there are sufficient facts to justify the finding that Terry A. Geron did in fact violate DR 6-101(A)(3), 7-101(A)(2), 7-101(A)(3), 1-102(A)(4), and 1-102(A)(6), and Gov. Bar R. VI(6).

Further, the disciplinary proceedings in both Indiana and Kentucky may be relied upon as further evidence of respondent’s unfitness to practice law. See Disciplinary Counsel v. Nothstein (1986), 21 Ohio St. 3d 108, 21 OBR 400, 488 N.E. 2d 180.

We concur in the recommendation of the board, and hereby…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. NothsteinOhio Supreme Court · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API