Bar Ass'n of Greater Cleveland v. McGarry
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
The facts herein leave no doubt that respondent flagrantly violated his oath of office and specifically DR 1-102 and 9-102 of the Code of Professional Responsibility. The criminal and probate proceedings referenced herein establish the element of moral turpitude which can not be condoned within the legal profession.
Having reviewed the testimony taken before the board, as well as all the submitted letters and documents, and after thorough consideration of respondent’s alleged defense of alcohol addiction, this court must concur with the findings of fact and recommendation of the board.
Therefore…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. ConnaughtonOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- Mahoning County Bar Ass'n v. MichaelsOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. NothsteinOhio Supreme Court · 1986
- Disciplinary Counsel v. ConnaughtonOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- Mahoning Cty. Bar Assn. v. MichaelsOhio Supreme Court · 1996