Legal Opinion

Hutchinson v. Stricklin

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 13, 1934PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBean, J.

North Powder river, a branch of Powder river, runs between Baker and Union counties. The water rights of the river and its tributaries were duly adjudicated by the circuit court and confirmed in part by this court in 1915. See In Re North Powder River, 75 Or. 83 (144 P. 485, 146 P. 475). The North Powder Milling & Mercantile Company has a mill near the lower- part of North Powder river, with a right to 25 second feet of water and a date of relative priority of 1870. This water for power is taken from the river a short distance above the mill and conducted to the mill in a canal. It is then…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Hough v. PorterOregon Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Nevada Ditch Co. v. BennettOregon Supreme Court · 1896
  3. In re Willow CreekOregon Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Richardson v. McNultyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
  5. In Re Water Rights of Deschutes RiverOregon Supreme Court · 1929

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Rencken v. YoungOregon Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Oliver v. Skinner and LodgeOregon Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Jones v. Warmsprings Irrigation DistrictOregon Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Vandehey v. WheelerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973
  5. State, Dept. of Parks v. IDAHO DEPT, WATER ADMIN.Idaho Supreme Court · 1974

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API