Legal Opinion
Gallipo v. City of Long Beach
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 6, 1958No. Civ. 22994PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWhite, P. J.
Defendant city of Long Beach appeals from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff, Daniel Claude Gallipo, a minor, by his guardian ad litem, Claude W. Gallipo, who is also his father.
• The action was occasioned by injuries to plaintiff, including permanent brain damage, suffered because of his fall from the defendant’s California Street Bridge when he was 8 years old. A former trial resulted in a nonsuit and judgment for defendant, which was reversed on appeal. (146 Cal.App.2d 520 [304 P.2d 106].) Hearing was denied by the Supreme Court.
The instant appeal is upon two grounds: (1) Insufficiency…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Kircher v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1948
- Gibson v. County of MendocinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- Demmer v. City of EurekaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
- Castro v. Sutter Creek Union High School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
- Gallipo v. City of Long BeachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Delta Farms Reclamation District v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
- Torkelson v. City of RedlandsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
- Acosta v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- Truck Insurance Exchange v. StilleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- Torkelson v. City of RedlandsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.