Legal Opinion

Acosta v. County of Los Angeles

California Supreme Court

Decided July 3, 1961No. L. A. 26238PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWhite, J.

Thomas Acosta, a minor, by his father, Richard Acosta, guardian ad litem, and Richard Acosta appeal from a judgment of dismissal following the. granting of defendant’s motion for summary judgment, in an action against the county of Los Angeles for personal injuries sustained by the minor, and for reimbursement for medical expenses incurred by Richard Acosta individually, as a result of injuries sustained by the minor plaintiff.

It is alleged in behalf of the minor that he was injured in a fall from his bicycle caused by a bump in a sidewalk negligently maintained by the county of Los Angeles.…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Arata v. Orleans Capitol Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1951
  2. Gibson v. County of MendocinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Demmer v. City of EurekaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  4. Betts v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  5. Castro v. Sutter Creek Union High School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Delta Farms Reclamation District v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
  2. O'Keefe v. South End Rowing ClubCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Asphalt Paving Co. v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Colorado · 1967
  4. Swaner v. City of Santa MonicaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  5. Torkelson v. City of RedlandsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API