Legal Opinion
Hann v. Venetian Blind Corporation
District Court, S.D. California
Decided June 13, 1936No. 880PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
YANKWICH, District Judge.
On July 26, 1930, Edwin Anderson filed his application in the United States Patent Office for letters patent for what is claimed to be a new and useful invention known as “Venetian Blind Bracket.” On October 27, 1931, letters patent No. 1,829,718 were granted to him for the invention. Anderson, by an assignment in writing, sold and assigned to Francis Hann, the plaintiff, all his right, title, and interest in the letters patent. By his bill of complaint in equity, Francis Hann, after making general allegations relating to the value, commercial utility, wide use of the…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Ashwander v. Tennessee Valley AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Moore v. New York Cotton ExchangeSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Nashville, C. & St. LR Co. v. WallaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Leman v. Krentler-Arnold Hinge Last Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Jones v. Securities & Exchange CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Treemond Co. v. Schering CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1941
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. HubbardDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1938
- Lehigh Coal & Navigation Co. v. Central R. of New JerseyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1940
- Dominion Electrical Mfg. Co. v. Edwin L. Wiegand Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1942
- Meinecke v. Eagle Druggists Supply Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1937
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.