Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Doyle v. Goldberg

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided March 30, 1936PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRugg, C.J.

The plaintiff seeks to recover in this action of tort compensation for personal injuries and damage to property sustained by her in February, 1934, while operating an automobile, through the negligence of the defendant in operating an automobile. The trial judge found for the plaintiff. It has not been argued that there was not sufficient evidence to support the finding that the harm to the plaintiff was caused by the negligence of the defendant. The only question for decision is whether the automobile of the plaintiff was legally registered. The plaintiff stated in her application for…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Bresnick v. HeathMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
  2. Nash v. LangMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
  3. Kennedy Bros. v. BirdMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
  4. Tuells v. FlintMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
  5. Jenkins v. North Shore Dye House, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Rummel v. PetersMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
  2. Levanosky v. LevanoskyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
  3. Bridges v. HartMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
  4. Kennedy v. SimmonsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
  5. Moroni v. BrawdersMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API