Legal Opinion

McDonald v. Dundon

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided June 30, 1922PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCrosby, J.

These are two actions of tort brought by the same plaintiff, to recover for personal injuries received by him by reason of a collision between a team which he was driving and an automobile owned and operated by the defendant Dundon. The cases were tried together; in the first, the jury found for the plaintiff; in the second a verdict was directed in favor of the defendant. It was agreed that if a verdict was erroneously ordered for the defendant Rawson, judgment should be entered for the plaintiff *231for such amount, if any, as the jury should find in the case against Dundon.

It is not contended…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Cohen v. . Mayor, Etc., of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  2. Dudley v. Northampton Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
  3. Comminge & Geisler v. StevensonTexas Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Fairbanks v. KempMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
  5. Gould v. ElderMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Opinion of the Justices to the Senate & the House of RepresentativesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1925
  2. Cook v. ColeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
  3. Tripp v. National Shawmut BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1928
  4. Bacon v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926
  5. Mitchell v. Hastings & Koch Enterprises, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1995

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API