Legal Opinion
Shubert v. Metrophone, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided March 20, 1990No. Nos. 89-1671, 89-1801PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
GREENBERG, Circuit Judge.
By this opinion we dispose of consolidated appeals from orders dismissing two actions brought in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania on behalf of subscribers to cellular phone service systems.1 The appellants, Steven Shubert and Gerard A. Margiotti, who are such subscribers, alleged that their service providers, the appellees, Met-rophone Inc. and Bell Atlantic Corp., intentionally divulged the contents of their cellular mobile phone communications, as well as those of other subscribers, without consent, in…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- D.P. Enterprises, Inc. v. Bucks County Community CollegeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
- Government Employees Insurance Company v. Benton, Ernest, in No. 88-1175. Benton, Ernest, in No. 88-1176 v. Government Employees Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
3Cited by17 opinions
- Bartnicki v. VopperSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- General Electric Co. v. CathcartCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
- In re Carrier IQ, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2015
- PBA Local No. 38 v. Woodbridge Police DepartmentDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1993
- Ditri v. Coldwell Banker Residential Affiliates, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.