Government Employees Insurance Company v. Benton, Ernest, in No. 88-1175. Benton, Ernest, in No. 88-1176 v. Government Employees Insurance Company
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
MANSMANN, Circuit Judge.
At issue is whether the Pennsylvania Motor Vehicle Financial Responsibility Law, 75 Pa.Cons.Stat.Ann. § 1701 et seq., (Pur-don 1984) (effective October 1,1984), which mandates underinsured motorist coverage, affects policies of insurance applied for prior to the effective date yet not actually received by the insured until sometime thereafter. We must interpret the meaning of the statute’s usage of the words “delivery”, “issued”, and “issued for delivery” in the context of delineating the scope of coverage of an automobile insurance policy.
Relying…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Mutual Life Insurance v. Hurni Packing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Adams v. Gould Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
- Allstate Insurance v. HeffnerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Heffner v. Allstate InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- Chrysler Credit Corporation v. First National Bank And Trust Company Of WashingtonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1984
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Belito Garcia v. Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2006
- Shubert v. Metrophone, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
- Geneva College v. SebeliusDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2013
- Cebula v. Royal & SunAlliance InsuranceDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2001
- Davis v. Erie Ins. GroupSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.