Legal Opinion
Hartford-Empire Co. v. Hazel-Atlas Glass Co.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided May 5, 1932No. 4414PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BUFFINGTON, Circuit Judge.
Of all the major industrial arts, glass blowing has been the slowest to change from hand to machine methods. In the three hundred years following the bringing of the glass-blowing industry to the United States by the Jamestown colonists and their building of two factories to make beads for sale to the Indians, there has been little, if any, change in the blowing of glass containers of any kind. This is due to several causes. The high skill and delicate handling of molten glass requisite for a glass blower made his art one where human skill seemed indispensable and…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Skelly Oil Co. v. Universal Oil Products Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1929
- Remington Cash Register Co. v. National Cash Register Co.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1925
- Consolidated Window Glass Co. v. Window Glass Mach. Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1919
- Homer Brooke Grass Co. v. Hartford-Fairmont Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1919
- Reed v. Cropp Concrete Machinery Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1916
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Hazel-Atlas Glass Co. v. Hartford-Empire Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Mas v. Coca-Cola Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1947
- United States v. Hartford-Empire Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1942
- Root Refining Co. v. Universal Oil Products Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1935
- Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Glenshaw Glass Co. Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. William Goldman Theatres, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1954
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.