Legal Opinion

Granite Buick GMC, Inc. v. Ray

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided November 6, 2014No. 26842PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ZINTER, Justice.

[¶ 1.] Adam Ray worked for Granite Buick GMC (Granite Buick), and Scott Hanna worked for McKie Ford Lincoln (McKie Ford). Ray and Hanna signed noncompete agreements during the course of their employments. When the two started their own automobile dealership, Granite Buick and McKie Ford moved for injunctions to enforce the agreements. The cases were consolidated, and the circuit court bifurcated the proceedings. The court impaneled a jury to determine Ray’s and Hanna’s affirmative defenses, and it ruled that it would determine the right to injunctive relief after the jury…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Beacon Theatres, Inc. v. WestoverSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  2. Deckert v. Independence Shares Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
  3. Garrett v. BankWest, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Black v. GardnerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Vander Heide v. Boke Ranch, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2007

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Vor, Inc. v. Estate of O'farrellSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2025
  2. Mealy v. PrinsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
  3. Estate of Ducheneaux v. Ducheneaux (In Re Estate of Ducheneaux)South Dakota Supreme Court · 2018
  4. Granite Buick GMC, Inc. v. RaySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
  5. Cal SD, LLC v. Interwest Leasing, LLCSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2024

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API