Legal Opinion

Granite Buick GMC, Inc. v. Ray

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 9, 2015No. 27356PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SEVERSON, Justice.

[¶ 1.] Adam Ray, employee of Granite Buick GMC, Inc., and Scott Hanna, employee of McKie Ford Lincoln, Inc., signed non-compete agreements during the course of their employment. They left their respective employment and started their own automobile dealership, Gateway Autoplex, LLC. Granite Buick and McKie Ford sought injunctions to enforce the non-compete agreements. A jury was impaneled to determine Ray’s and Hanna’s affirmative defenses. The circuit court treated the jury verdict as binding; on appeal we reversed and remanded for findings of facts and conclusions of law.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Auto-Owners Insurance Co. v. Hansen Housing, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Miller v. JacobsenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Western Casualty & Surety Co. v. American National Fire Insurance Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Poeppel v. LesterSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
  5. Harms v. Northland Ford DealersSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Garrett v. StockDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2025
  2. Garrett v. StockDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2023
  3. McKie Ford Lincoln, Inc. v. HannaSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API