Legal Opinion

Black v. Gardner

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided June 2, 1982No. 13443PublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*155DUNN, Justice

(on reassignment).

This case involves a series of gifts given by Charlotte Black (Charlotte) to appellants Charles and Evelyn Gardner (hereinafter referred to individually as Charles and Evelyn respectively or jointly as Gardners). Appellee Shirley Black (Shirley), as guardian of the person and estate of Charlotte, claims these gifts resulted from the exercise of fraud and undue influence on Charlotte by Gardners. She also claims that these gifts were obtained by Gardners willfully, wantonly, maliciously and fraudulently from Charlotte. Shirley prayed for recovery of actual…

2Cases cited51 opinions

  1. International Bankers Life Insurance Co. v. HollowayTexas Supreme Court · 1963
  2. In Re Estate of HobelsbergerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Shaffer v. Honeywell, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Engberg v. Ford Motor CompanySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Lytle v. MorganSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1978

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. Hazelwood v. Illinois Central Gulf RailroadAppellate Court of Illinois · 1983
  2. Don M. Davis, as of the Estate of Ethlyn M. Davis, Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990
  3. Arcon Construction Co. v. South Dakota Cement PlantSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Commonwealth Department of Agriculture v. VinsonKentucky Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Wheeldon v. MadisonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API