Ex Parte Sinegar
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the CourtKeller, P.J.
We hold that the requirements of Rule 18a, 1 regarding the recusal of judges, apply in habeas proceedings conducted at the trial level and that applicant satisfied those requirements here. Consequently, we remand this case for the trial judge to rule on applicant’s motion to recuse pursuant to Rule 18a(c).
I. BACKGROUND
Applicant pleaded no contest to aggravated kidnapping and was placed on ten years’ deferred adjudication. His guilt was later adjudicated, and he was sentenced to seventy-five years in prison. Acting pro se, applicant subsequently filed a habeas application under Article 11.07.…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Arnold v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993
- Campbell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2010
- in the Interest of E.A. and D.A., ChildrenTexas Supreme Court · 2009
3Cited by47 opinions
- In Re Thompson, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2011
- Ex parte ThuesenCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2017
- Roy Dean Duffey v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2014
- Barton, Bradley JaredCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2012
- Canton, Jamarios LechristopherCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2015
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.