Arnold v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON APPELLANTS’ PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
McCORMICK, Presiding Judge.
Appellants were convicted by a jury of the misdemeanor offense of disruptive activity on a university campus. V.T.C.A., Education Code, Section 4.30(a), (b)(2) (1972). The trial court assessed a fine of $200.00 for each appellant and imprisonment of three months for seven appellants and five months for three appellants. The Austin Court of Appeals affirmed the convictions for all appellants. Arnold v. State, 778 S.W.2d 172 (Tex.App.—Austin 1989). 1 This Court granted appellants’ petitions for discretionary…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Zwickler v. KootaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Bynum v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1989
- Jackson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1977
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by194 opinions
- Fairow v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
- De Leon v. AguilarCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2004
- Smith, Al LetroyCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2014
- Abdygapparova v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2007
- Ex Parte RieckCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2004
189 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.