Legal Opinion

Alt v. Parker

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided October 19, 1993No. 9218SC909PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McCRODDEN, Judge.

Plaintiff argues that the trial court erroneously entered summary judgment on his three remaining claims, malicious prosecution, false imprisonment, and deprivation of due process, because he presented evidence that created a genuine issue of material fact as to each of these claims. For the following reasons, we find that the trial court properly entered summary judgment as to each of plaintiff’s claims.

Under Rule 56 of the N.C. Rules of Civil Procedure, summary judgment is proper “if the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Youngberg v. Romeo Ex Rel. RomeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Corum v. University of North CarolinaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1992
  3. Myrick v. CooleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
  4. Jones v. GwynneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
  5. Mitchell v. GoldenCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1992

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Love-Lane v. MartinCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2004
  2. Hughes v. BedsoleCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1995
  3. Hughes v. BedsoleCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1995
  4. Davis v. Town of Southern PinesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
  5. Rousselo v. StarlingCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API