Legal Opinion

State v. Busby

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 22, 1991No. 84-08-1789; CA A63295PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendant appeals an order revoking his probation and sentencing him to five years imprisonment. He contends that his decision to proceed without counsel was not an informed decision. The state concedes that the record does not show that defendant was advised of the nature of the allegations in the probation revocation hearing, the consequences of a revocation or the consequences and pitfalls of representing himself.

Defendant was entitled under Article I, section 11, of the Oregon Constitution and the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution to be represented by counsel. State ex rel…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. VernaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1972
  2. State Ex Rel. Russell v. JonesOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  3. State v. BoswellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Juvenile Department v. H.-O.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  2. State v. AltCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  3. State Ex Rel. Juv. Dept. v. JH-O.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  4. State v. TorresCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API