Fox v. Hall
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
From the judgment which followed the granting of defendants’ motion for a nonsuit, plaintiffs appeal.
The averments of plaintiffs’ complaint essential to this consideration are the following: Lola Pox (wife of plaintiff, Henry Pox), her brother, Clarence C. Hall, and her sister, Rosa E. Patehett, defendants herein, were the owners in fee as tenants in common, each seised of an undivided one-third of a certain ranch in Sonoma County. The ranch was encumbered by a mortgage securing an indebtedness of some twenty-nine thousand dollars, due the William Hill Company, a corporation. Lola…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Marvin v. . BrooksNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
- Coward v. ClantonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Zellerbach v. AllenbergCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Duff v. DuffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- Green v. BrooksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- American Aeronautics Corp. v. Grand Central Aircraft Co.California Court of Appeal · 1957
- Morton v. Morton Realty Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1925
- Frankfort Marine Accident and Plate Glass Insurance Co. v. California Artistic Metal and Wire Co.California Court of Appeal · 1915
- Berkowitz v. the Kiener Co.California Court of Appeal · 1940
- Fredendall v. ShraderCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.