Legal Opinion

Heron Interact, Inc. v. Guidelines, Inc.

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided July 2, 2007No. Civil Action No. 05-30290-KPNPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER WITH REGARD TO DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO COMPEL PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS and PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO STRIKE (Document Nos. 21 and 23)

NEIMAN, United States Chief Magistrate Judge.

Presently before the court are Defendants Guidelines, Inc. and Mark Langevin’s motion to compel production of documents and Plaintiff Heron Interact, Inc.’s cross-motion to strike. Both motions relate to the Rule 30(b)(6) deposition of Gary M. Chacho (“Chacho”), Plaintiffs principal. Chacho was designated by Plaintiff to testify “as to matters known or reasonably available to the organization.”…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. United States v. NoblesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. United States v. TaylorDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1996
  5. Harding v. Dana Transport, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1996

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Balbiani v. Chester Public Utility District, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2022
  2. Baxter International, Inc. v. Becton Dickinson and CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2019
  3. L v. Dev. Assocs. v. Eighth Jud. Dist. Ct.Nevada Supreme Court · 2014
  4. L v. Dev. Assocs. v. Eighth Jud. Dist. Ct.Nevada Supreme Court · 2014
  5. Luke v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 2022

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API