Legal Opinion
Harding v. Dana Transport, Inc.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided January 25, 1996No. Civ. A. 94-4261(JEI)PublishedCited by 62 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ROSEN, United States Magistrate Judge:
Presently before the court is the motion of Steven M. Berlin, Esquire, counsel for Defendant Dana Transport, Inc. (hereinafter “Dana”), for a protective order preventing or in the alternative limiting the deposition of William J. Bowe pursuant to Rule 26(c), Fed. R.Civ.P. 1 After careful consideration of the parties’ submissions, and after further consideration of the oral argument conducted on November 3, 1995, and for the reasons noted below, the defendant’s motion shall be granted in -part and denied in part.
I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
Plain…
2Cases cited48 opinions
- Meritor Savings Bank, FSB v. VinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- United States v. NoblesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Andrews v. City of PhiladelphiaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by62 opinions
- Payton v. New Jersey Turnpike AuthoritySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1997
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. BradyDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2006
- John Doe v. Lexington-Fayette Urban County Government, John Doe v. Pam Miller, Keith Rene Guy, Sr. v. Lexington-Fayette Urban County GovernmentCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
- Mancia v. Mayflower Textile Servs. Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 2008
- Neuder v. Battelle Pacific Northwest National LaboratoryDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2000
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.