Legal Opinion

Entertainment By J & J, Inc. v. Tia Maria Mexican Restaurant & Cantina, Inc.

District Court, S.D. Texas

Decided February 9, 2000No. Civ.A. H-99-1573PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

GILMORE, District Judge.

Pending before the Court is Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (Instrument No. 12). *776Having considered the submissions of the party and the applicable law, the Court finds that Defendants’ motion should be DENIED.

I

Plaintiff Entertainment by J & J, Inc. (“EJJ”) brings this action against Defendants Tia Maria Mexican Restaurant and Cantina, Inc. d/b/a/ Tia Maria’s Mexican Restaurant and Pedro Arreguin (collectively “Defendants”), claiming violation of the Federal Communications Act of 1934, § 705, as amended in the Cable Communications Act of 1984, 47 U.S.C. §§ 605 and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. DelCostello v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Lampf, Pleva, Lipkind, Prupis & Petigrow v. GilbertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Hebert Abstract Company, Inc. v. Touchstone Properties, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
  4. North Star Steel Co. v. ThomasSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  5. Varel Manufacturing Co. v. Acetylene Oxygen Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1999

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Prostar v. MassachiCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001
  2. KingVision Pay Per View, Ltd. v. Boom Town Saloon, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2000
  3. Time Warner Cable National Division v. BubaczDistrict Court, N.D. West Virginia · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API