Legal Opinion

Time Warner Cable National Division v. Bubacz

District Court, N.D. West Virginia

Decided June 1, 2001No. Civ.A.1:00CV191Published

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND PLAINTIFF’S CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

KEELEY, District Judge.

The Court has before it the defendants’, John and Janet Bubacz [“Bubaezs”], motion for summary judgment seeking a dismissal of this civil action on the ground that it is barred by the applicable statute of limitations [Docket No. 17]. In response, the plaintiff, Time Warner Cable National Division [“Time Warner”], has filed a brief in opposition to defendants’ motion, as well as a cross-motion for summary judgment [Docket No. 18]. The defendants have filed a reply…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. DelCostello v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Lampf, Pleva, Lipkind, Prupis & Petigrow v. GilbertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API